Dignity Institute Level 2 Facilitation and Leadership
Dignity Institute Level 2 Facilitation and Leadership
The Level 2 Facilitation & Leadership Cohort is a 30-hour advanced training designed for staff who already have foundational experience in Dignity-Infused Community Engagement and need deeper, more specialized skills to lead teams, guide complex conversations, and improve organizational outcomes. This program is ideal for mid-level and senior practitioners in social services, youth development, mental health, housing, planning, public health, and other community-facing departments who frequently manage groups, facilitate meetings, or coordinate multi-stakeholder processes.
Atlanta, GA (Midtown Area) | March 23-25, 2026
About Level 2
Building on the core competencies of Level 1 or DICE Essentials, Level 2 strengthens ability to:
Apply dignity-centered frameworks to complex cases involving multiple agencies or community groups;
Strengthen internal workflows around engagement, communications, and stakeholder coordination;
Guide cross-functional teams through problem-solving and decision-making;
Support supervisors and department heads by modeling consistent, high-quality public-facing practice.
The Level 2 Cohort offers a more strategic, leadership-focused experience. Unlike Level 1 and DICE Essentials, this program emphasizes:
Advanced facilitation techniques for complex or multi-stakeholder environments;
Leadership identity development and reflective practice;
Scenario-based learning using real department or regional case studies;
Team leadership tools for improving internal alignment and communication;
Applied practice labs that simulate high-pressure or high-impact conversations;
Coaching-style frameworks for mentoring or supervising staff.
Level 2 does not repeat foundational content from earlier cohorts—ensuring efficient, targeted use of agency time and resources. The Level 2 Facilitation & Leadership Cohort equips agencies with internal leaders who can steward complex conversations, guide teams through uncertainty, and model the high-quality community engagement expected of public-serving institutions—making it a legitimate, fiscally sound use of training funds.